Baseline hygiene
Layer 2: the transport-independent client discipline every wallet owes, on top of whatever scenario it picks. It’s §5 of the network privacy analysis.
Assume an ideal transport. The destination still receives, for every request, its content and its arrival time. These countermeasures are transport-independent — they work in every configuration and are the wallet's responsibility regardless of which scenario is chosen. A light wallet resumes each sync from the height where it last stopped, so consecutive sessions chain; of a session's two endpoints, only the start is fingerprintable, since the end equals the chain tip shared by every client syncing at that moment.
Start-height obfuscation
V3 · vs L2Since the linking key is the start height (V3, content), it is enough to obfuscate the start. Both approaches cost only re-downloaded blocks and work in every configuration.
Broadcast hygiene and scheduling
V2 · vs L2Broadcast timing is a V2 (timing) leak at the destination. In-transit mixing does not remove it — the destination still observes wall-clock arrival time — so the wallet must decorrelate broadcasts itself.
Tuning the overlap distribution and checkpoint spacing
V3 · vs L2How aggressively to obfuscate the start is a design choice with a clear qualitative shape but no settled numbers. A larger overlap, or a wider checkpoint spacing, widens the collision window — and therefore the anonymity set of clients emitting an indistinguishable start — at the cost of more re-downloaded blocks. Both approaches cost only re-downloaded blocks and apply in every configuration.
These measures apply in every configuration of the site and are the wallet’s responsibility regardless of transport.